Analyzing my favorite roll
(and why it worked)
I’ve been thinking about what makes a roll feel great - and what doesn’t. For me personally, I know the outcome will be better when I take my time (makes sense, doesn’t it?). This one was shot over the course of a month which is rare for me, usually I finish a roll in a week or two. I’m always torn between acting fast and doing things perfectly - but acting fast usually wins. That’s why I like to have a place to gather all my ideas (I use Notion for this). When inspiration hits, I can pick something from that list. I recently came across the work of Gilbert Garcin and was instantly inspired by his photos, in particular the one with a dandelion. I don’t think his image is a double exposure though, if I remember correctly he used a small cut-out of himself.
I like for each roll to feel like a visual collage when I go through the scans - very rarely do I shoot the same scene twice, so there’s variety between all the frames. I guess I also like to maximize each roll as it’s an expensive hobby - I simply can’t afford to shoot six frames of every single scene.
Another thing I’ve considered is that I really like the mix of indoor shots (self portraits, silhouettes) layered with outside shots (clouds, water, flowers) in my double exposures. They really represent how I felt when I was shooting this roll - stuck inside, but wanting to explore the world outside.
How do you approach shooting a scene? Do you move on after one shot, or do you work the same scene until it feels perfect? Let me know in the comments!
Shot with Nikon FE - Kentmere Pan 200
x Linda









































Wow loved it
These are absolutely stunning.